Friday, August 1, 2008

Britney Spears Wants No Contact With Sam Lutfi




Britney Spears doesn’t need a restraining order against former sidekick Sam Lutfi anymore.

“Britney has made clear to everyone that she does not want to be further harassed or contacted in any way by Osama ‘Sam’ Lutfi, now or at anytime in the future,” the pop star’s attorney said.

Spears will not seek an extension for a restraining order against Lutfi, because she has made it clear to the old pal that she wants nothing to do with him.

Lutfi, for the time being, seems willing to go along with those wishes.

At attorney for Lutfi released the following statement Wednesday: “Mr. Lutfi and Mr. Spears have mutually agreed in private that no hearing or order is necessary at this time.”

Attorneys for Spears and her father, Jamie, are expected to appear in a Los Angeles courtroom Thursday morning to give an update on the conservatorship. A hearing on a temporary restraining order barring Lutfi from having contact with the pop singer was also scheduled for Thursday. The order issued earlier this year required Lutfi to stay 250 yards away from Spears or her homes.

Spears’ mom accused Lutfi in court papers of keeping her daughter a hostage in her own home, drugging her and taking over her finances.

He was with the singer when she was photographed without underwear and various other situations the star exhibited erratic behavior.

Spears’ father has control over his 26-year-old daughter’s personal life and finances. Thursday’s hearing had originally been scheduled to decide whether the conservatorship should be made permanent, but Los Angeles Superior Court Commissioner Reva Goetz decided weeks ago that she would instead consider other issues.

It is unclear how long Spears’ affairs will remain under her father’s control, but Ingham wrote that he does not expect her feelings about Lutfi to change.

“If Mr. Lutfi makes any future attempt to contact Britney after the temporary conservatorship has concluded, Britney has made clear she will take all appropriate legal action,” Ingham wrote.

Photo and Source

No comments: